U.S. strikes Iran from south to north as regional war expands
American attacks stretched from southern Iran to the Caspian coast after Trump promised major punishment for Iran and its Houthi allies.
The United States completed a thirteenth consecutive night of strikes on Iran as fighting spread toward American bases and vital shipping routes, raising the risk of a wider regional war.
At the same time, the White House imposed new double-digit tariffs on dozens of trading partners, provoking international protests and fresh warnings about higher consumer costs. The sheer volume of war and trade disruption has displaced the unresolved Jeffrey Epstein scandal from many front pages—a reminder that political accountability can be buried beneath crises of a president’s own making.
American attacks stretched from southern Iran to the Caspian coast after Trump promised major punishment for Iran and its Houthi allies.
The military said it hit missile, drone, surveillance and coastal targets as the conflict continued without a durable diplomatic exit.
Drones targeted the Irbil area, underscoring how quickly the U.S.-Iran conflict is spreading across national borders.
Duties of 10 to 12.5 per cent drew protests from allies and rivals alike, with critics calling the forced-labour rationale a convenient pretext.
The new import taxes affect major economies including China, Japan and Australia and are expected to raise costs throughout global supply chains.
Huge blazes merged outside Madrid while searing heat and drought left landscapes across southern Europe dangerously dry.
Authorities prepared for flooding and transport disruption as the storm moved closer to heavily populated eastern regions.
Doctors describe overwhelmed services, repeated attacks on medical facilities and millions of people needing urgent assistance.
Four Palestinians from one family and an Israeli were killed near Nablus, raising fears of reprisals and further escalation.
A new European sanctions package targeted Russian interests while attacks on both sides killed civilians and deepened the long war.
The Epstein files remain an unresolved test of transparency and accountability. Yet the front page has limited space, and a president capable of generating war, tariff shocks and institutional conflict can overwhelm the public agenda. Whether intentional or merely convenient, the effect is the same: scrutiny of politically dangerous questions fades as citizens and news organizations are forced to absorb a succession of larger, louder emergencies.