Reuters reports that the Army has burned through most of its global ATACMS and Precision Strike Missile stocks, raising concerns about readiness for crises involving Russia or China.
Tehran appears to be betting that higher energy costs, American war fatigue and shrinking U.S. missile reserves will force Washington toward concessions over the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran says reopening the strategic waterway still depends on Washington accepting broader conditions, including an end to hostilities and sanctions relief.
Russia launched six ballistic missiles and more than 150 drones overnight, while Ukraine struck Russian oil refineries in retaliation.
The largest U.S. reservoir has reached a historic low as the Colorado River system continues to struggle under prolonged drought and heavy demand.
Record temperatures are adding pressure to food prices, infrastructure, supply chains and public finances as investors take greater notice of climate exposure.
Fire crews and military units are fighting multiple blazes amid temperatures near 40°C, strong winds and worsening drought across southeastern Europe.
Rheinmetall says planned ATACMS production with Lockheed Martin will take time to ramp up, underscoring the difficulty of rapidly replacing weapons consumed in the Iran conflict.
The most alarming measure of the Iran war may not be territory taken or targets destroyed, but weapons consumed. Reuters reports that the U.S. Army has used “virtually all” of its ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles during five months of fighting, with Patriot, THAAD and Tomahawk inventories also substantially diminished. Those are not easily replaced weapons. They are among the systems Washington would depend upon in another major crisis, particularly one involving Russia or China. The depletion matters even more because the war has not produced the quick strategic victory predicted at its outset. Iran still exerts enormous influence over shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and now appears to believe that time, higher energy costs and American war fatigue are strengthening its bargaining position. President Trump has acknowledged that supplies of some munitions are tight, while manufacturers say meaningful increases in production will take years. Critics have long alleged that the Iran conflict also served to divert political attention from the Epstein controversy; that motive has not been established as fact. What can now be measured is the military cost. Whatever the political calculation behind the decision to fight, America has spent scarce weapons at extraordinary speed while a strengthened Iran presses for concessions and other potential adversaries watch closely. The larger lesson is an old one: great powers can possess enormous arsenals and still discover that advanced precision weapons are finite, slow to manufacture and strategically irreplaceable once a supposedly short war becomes a long one.