Tehran says technical arrangements with Oman are nearly complete while insisting that Washington must still meet wider Iranian conditions before normal shipping resumes.
Reuters analysis finds Washington caught between further escalation and a settlement that could require concessions to an Iran the campaign was supposed to force into submission.
The 50-49 vote followed Republican unease over Justice Department independence and Blanche’s handling of politically sensitive matters, including Epstein-related records.
Russia launched ballistic missiles and more than 150 drones overnight, while Ukraine struck Russian oil refineries in retaliation.
The largest U.S. reservoir has reached a historic low as the Colorado River system continues to struggle under prolonged drought and heavy demand.
The EU is pressing members to invest more heavily in fire prevention as extreme heat and wildfire losses mount across Europe and Asia.
A Reuters/Ipsos poll found far more Americans expect greater Middle East instability than greater stability as the conflict drags on.
Tehran appears to be betting that energy costs, war fatigue and depleted American missile reserves will force Washington toward concessions.
President Trump’s Iran war is increasingly defined by a contradiction: the longer it continues, the harder it becomes to claim victory, yet ending it may require concessions that would make the original campaign look strategically self-defeating. Iran now says a technical arrangement with Oman over shipping through the Strait of Hormuz is close, but Tehran is tying a full reopening to broader demands on sanctions, hostilities and frozen assets. At the same time, the United States has burned through scarce precision munitions, public backing for the conflict is weak and Iran appears convinced that economic pressure and American war fatigue are improving its negotiating position. Reuters describes Trump as facing an increasingly tight dilemma with no obvious exit. Critics have argued from the beginning that the war helped push the Epstein controversy away from the centre of the political conversation; that alleged motive remains an interpretation rather than an established fact. But as an editorial judgment, the political irony is becoming sharper: a conflict portrayed by opponents as an attempted distraction has generated a fresh set of damaging headlines of its own — depleted arsenals, higher energy costs, casualties, strategic concessions and no decisive victory. If Washington escalates again, those costs may deepen. If it settles, Iran may emerge with greater recognized influence over the waterway than before the war. Either way, the campaign that was supposed to demonstrate overwhelming American power increasingly looks like a trap from which the president cannot easily escape.